Showing posts with label Secularism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Secularism. Show all posts

Monday, July 29, 2019

'Never accept' separation of faith from political engagement

Christians are called to win the battle of ideas and values in secular society, Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput said on Tuesday.

In a speech delivered to the Alliance Defending Freedom Summit on Religious Liberty on July 9, the archbishop said authentic religious freedom is essential in shaping a society of love, “the animating spirit of all authentically Christian political action.”

“I mean love in the biblical sense: love with a heart of courage, love determined to build justice in society and focused on the true good of the whole human person, body and soul.”

Chaput told the audience of lawyers from around the world that Christians must work to build an authentic vision of society built around the common good, and that “human progress means more than getting more stuff, more entitlements, and more personal license.”

“Real human progress satisfies the human hunger for solidarity and communion,” Chaput said. 

“When our leaders and their slogans tell us to move ‘forward into the future,’ we need to take a very hard look at the road we’re on, where ‘forward’ leads, and whether it ennobles the human soul or just aggravates our selfishness, our isolation, and our appetite for things.”

True religious freedom is crucial to serving real human progress, the archbishop said, drawing a distinction between it and “the half-starved copy of the real thing called ‘freedom of worship.’”

“We can never accept a separation of our religious faith and moral convictions from our public ministries or our political engagement. It’s impossible. And even trying to do so is evil because it forces us to live two different lives, worshiping God at home and in our churches; and worshiping the latest version of Caesar everywhere else.”

Saturday, June 30, 2018

No one can escape the wrath of Rodrigo Duterte

RT  24 Jun, 2018
No one can escape the wrath of Rodrigo Duterte, one of the toughest-talking world leaders today, be it a US president, UN chief, or even the Pope! The Philippines president has now gone a step further by calling God “stupid.”
This time the 72-year-old leader targeted the concept of original sin in the Bible. During a speech at the opening of the 2018 Information and Communications Technology Summit in Davao City on Friday, Duterte recalled the Bible creation story of Adam and Eve and how they ate the forbidden fruit.

“Adam ate it… then malice was born. Who is this stupid God? That son of a b*tch is stupid if that’s the case,” the outspoken leader said. “You created something perfect and then you think of an event that would tempt and destroy the quality of your work.” 
Notorious for his controversial statements, the president continued, saying that babies shouldn’t be responsible for original sin. “That was your mother and father’s deed, you weren’t born yet, but now you have original sin. What kind of religion is that? I can’t accept it.” Duterte, however, said he still believes in the existence of “a universal mind.”

Sunday, April 29, 2018

Remarks by French President Emmanuel Macron that he wanted to repair church-state ties caused uproar


 


France24 2018-04-11 

The Catholic Church and the state were for centuries virtually indistinguishable in France but the 1789 Revolution and 19th century modernisation saw the two formally separated by a 1905 law.

Macron, who prides himself on tackling difficult issues head-on, told a meeting of bishops Monday that he hoped to repair relations with the Church through a "dialogue of truth".

"A president of the French republic who takes no interest in the Church and its Catholics would be failing in his duty," he said.

Former socialist prime minister Manuel Valls, who backed Macron for president in 2017, tweeted that "secularism is France".

"Secularism is the jewel in our crown. That is what a president of the republic should be defending," newly-installed Socialist Party leader Olivier Faure said in a tweet.

Jean-Luc Melenchon, lead of the left-wing France Insoumise (France Unbowed) party, said Macron's remarks were "irresponsible".

"Macron in full-on metaphysical delirium. Outrageous. One expects a president, one gets a little priest," Melenchon said in a tweet.

Interior Minister Gerard Collomb, who is responsible for government relations with religious groups, said Macron's remarks reflected the need for greater spiritual awareness and did not undermine France's secular traditions.

"What he is saying is that for human beings, there is not only the material world but also the search for absolute values, for spirituality, to find meaning in life," he said.

"It is perhaps a new tone but in no way does it break with the great tradition of secularism."

Opinion polls show the French roughly split between believers and non-believers while the role and place of religion in the country remains sensitive.

Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Second Sunday will be ‘rest day’ for TV industry in India

| TNN |
The television industry is known for toiling relentlessly to give us our daily dose of entertainment.

Due to the frenetic pace, actors and technicians are hardly left with any time to unwind. However, there is some respite in sight for them as the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) has decided to make every second Sunday a mandatory holiday for the TV industry from April 1. While artistes have welcomed the move, producers are worried about its adverse effects on the telecast of their shows.
Dilip Pithva, Honorary General Secretary, FWICE, reasons, "We have decided to take a holiday on every second Sunday. The producers aren't supportive as they don't want to shell out extra money for a holiday that will be considered paid leave. Do they realize the rising frustration levels of the workers working in the same environment day-in and day-out? What they don't know is that the worker pays another member to fill in for him on a particular day from his own pocket. They may be hired on the basis of salary, but they are actually paid for the number of days they shoot; they don't even get overtime." He adds this issue can be addressed if enough planning is done in advance and explains, "If a producer can holiday abroad without worrying about the telecast of their shows, why can't they manage it by making second Sunday a mandatory off? They can work towards getting scripts in advance, so that they can keep a bank of episodes ready."
 
ACTORS GLAD TO GET A DAY OFF
Gautam Rode, currently seen in 'Suryaputra Karn', says, "The mandatory off will make an actor's life much easier, especially when you are shooting away from the city. Many actors shoot for 30 days, which has an adverse effect on their health and performance. Should a situation arise, I'm sure producers can manage without shooting for two days in a month."
Ssharad Malhotra, the male lead in 'Kasam', seconds the actor, "It's a viable idea if executed well. We slog daily and need an off to replenish our energy. But when telecast issues crop up, we don't mind shooting an extra day as we understand that TV is a deadline-driven medium. Contrary to the general perception, an actor doesn't get time for his personal life. Better time and resource management would surely help at all levels."

Actress Meghna Malik calls the current TV scenario a 'war zone' rather than a 'work zone'. "The TV industry isn't equipped to give technicians, actors or producers even the fixed calendar holidays as telecast deadlines have to be met. It's a work-till-you-drop-dead policy. It is high time that things change."
However, some actors feel they should get an off on weekdays. Actress Arti Singh says, "The industry should be more organized. Ideally, we need four holidays in a month. We should get a weekly holiday on a working day as we don't face gruelling traffic on Sunday."
Sana Amin Sheikh adds, "We also have important chores to run, which can't happen on Sundays. But if shows are aired seven days a week, it will be difficult to get a holiday, especially for lead actors. I am used to this, so I don't mind."

WHY IT CAN'T BE ACHIEVED
The producers have been averse to the proposed idea as they believe it would result in confusion on set and hamper the telecast. They suggest that everyone can take a weekly off after coming to a consensus.
Producer Rahul Kumar Tewary says, "We haven't been informed about the development as yet. It should be a unanimous decision. No individual or association can take a stand, which impacts the entire industry. Meeting the deadline for delivering content in shows, which air six days a week, is a difficult feat in itself. We also incur late delivery charges if an episode is sent to the channel beyond the decided hours. Our team is working round-the-clock to meet the telecast demands as well address various issues at the shoot. The weekly/monthly-offs without implementing the required procedures will affect shows and deliveries."

Producer Rajan Shahi asserts that it's a misconception that the television industry works without a break. He elaborates, "There are some who deviate, and that issue needs to be addressed immediately. The unit gets breaks at regular intervals (usually four days off in a month ) to rest and improve its efficiency. I myself give breaks according to the unit's convenience." He adds that fixing a day off isn't a feasible option as people might prefer to take a holiday on another day. "A holiday is necessary and mandatory, but those working should get to decide when they want to take an off," says Rajan.
Producer Sumeet Mittal emphasises, "We are in favour of granting an off to the entire cast and crew as they are overworked, but it's not feasible to commit a particular day for it. With all daily soaps airing seven days a week, it's impossible to do so. What if the telecast is stuck or an emergency situation crops up?"

NO CONSENSUS YET
Amit Behl, joint secretary of CINTAA (Cine and Television Artistes' Association), member of the dispute committee and Senior Vice President of FWICE, feels that both the parties have a valid point. He says, "A second Sunday off was a valid rule in the early '90s, when the deliverables weren't that high. Soon, a day-and-a-half shift (12 hours) became a regular feature. In the current scenario, where we are prone to casualties and other issues hampering the telecast, the broadcasters (before the October 2015 strike) passed a ruling that all producers will keep a bank of at least 10 episodes for their shows. Unfortunately, not many follow the rule. It's primarily because the scripts don't come in advance." However, he adds that it won't be right to blame anyone as everyone is fighting the ratings war. He explains, "I am fine with the idea of making second Sundays a mandatory holiday, provided producers are also given leeway to shoot on that particular day if the situation demands so. They do seek permission when they do a 2 pm to 2 am odd shift. I also second the producers, who propose that taking a holiday should be mutually decided upon, as we are not in a government job. We at CINTAA are still not clear till we have a detailed discussion with the producers' association and the broadcasters."

Director Ismail Umarr Khan feels, "We can easily handle the pressure on an odd day with the second unit filling in for the first, which was a norm earlier. A unit can easily take the pressure of one episode. Every technician wants a holiday. I don't think anyone is against taking an off on Sundays. The bottom line is, workers will have a life."           Indian Times

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

An organ of the Vatican newspaper has slammed the new "Star Wars" film as a thorough disappointment because its villains are not sufficiently evil.

An organ of the Vatican has slammed the new "Star Wars" film as a thorough disappointment because its villains are not sufficiently evil.
The Vatican's daily newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, has given a dismal review to "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," even as it breaks box-office records.
While the Vatican might have been expected to sing the praises of any "Star Wars" film, given the series' depictions of the battle between good and evil, the latest installment, directed by J.J. Abrams, drops the ball on sheer badness with a crop of unconvincing villains, the non-bylined review claims.
"The new director's set-up fails most spectacularly in its representation of evil, meaning the negative characters," according to the review. "Darth Vader and above all the Emperor Palpatine were two of the most efficient villains in that genre of American cinema."
This time around, the villains are more insipid than devilish, the paper adds.
"The counterpart of Darth Vader, Kylo Ren, wears a mask merely to emulate his predecessor, while the character who needs to substitute the emperor Palpatine as the incarnation of supreme evil represents the most serious defect of the film," it wrote. "Without revealing anything about the character, all we will say is that it is the clumsiest and tackiest result you can obtain from computer graphics."
Amid a torrent of positive reviews for "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," which praise the film's old-fashioned sense of adventure, a handful of critics have complained it is a thinly disguised recycling of the original "Star Wars" movies.
In that vein, The Vatican's newspaper agrees, calling the film "more reboot than sequel." For good measure it adds, "Not a classy reboot however, like Nolan's Batman, but an update twisted to suit today's tastes and a public more accustomed to sitting in front of a computer than in a cinema."
Sticking the knife in further, the review adds, "Abrams' direction is in fact modelled on the sloppiest current action films derived from the world of videogames."
"The only merit of J.J. Abrams film is to show, by contrast, how the direction of the previous films was elegant, balanced and above all appropriate."
L'Osservatore Romano, has first published in 1861, has built a name for lively film reviews since its editor was told to spice up the paper in 2007 by then-Pope Benedict.

Since then, the paper has interspersed its reports on papal Masses and synods with articles about Bob Dylan and a look back at films including "The Blues Brothers."
Not all its film reviews are as tough as the one on the new "Star Wars" installment. In 2012, the paper raved about the 007 film "Skyfall," even lauding the "extremely beautiful Bond girls."
This year, it described futuristic road movie "Mad Max, Fury Road" as "a real, true masterpiece." On the other hand, it slammed Ridley Scott's "Exodus: Gods and Kings," saying it added nothing new to the biblical story except a welter of special effects.        LA Times

Note: Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? 2 Corinthians 6:14  Biblehub