The Guardian 4 Nov 2020 1
Proposals to prosecute individuals for hate crimes based on what they discuss in their own homes need to be more widely debated, free speech organisations have said.
The suggestion to remove the “dwelling” privacy exemption from criminal legislation is buried in a few paragraphs of the Law Commission’s 544-page consultation on hate crime published in September.
The commission said on Wednesday that it was “not intending for private conversations at the dinner table to be prosecuted as hate speech”, although that appears to be one possible consequence of the proposed change.
Until 1986, the offence of using words or behaviour intended or likely to incite racial hatred could only be committed in a public place. The scope was later expanded, but an exception remains “where words or behaviour are used or written material displayed within a dwelling, provided that they cannot be seen or heard outside.”
The proposal was spotted by the organisation Fair Cop, which campaigns
against what it says is misuse of legislation to curb free speech. Sarah
Phillimore, a barrister and member of the organisation, said it would
encourage “state surveillance or people to inform on their friends. How
else would they get the evidence? It will be like the East German Stasi
security service.”
No comments:
Post a Comment